Unser Stromanbieter hat den Preis angehoben, deswegen bin ich auf der suche nach alternativen.
Gibts irgendwo im netz so ne art rechner? oder ne aktuelle tabelle?
sowas im stile von www.onlinekosten.de ?
Off Topic 20.274 Themen, 225.163 Beiträge
Mario32 
Hellspawn „Strompreis Rechner ?“
hier noch was im zusammenhang mit atomarer strahlung und menschlicher faktor:
DER Patient hat halt pech gehabt, das man ihm den falschen teil seines Hirns "gebraten" hat!
DAS IST DER MENSCHLICHE FAKTOR, DER DIE NUTZUNG VON KERNENERGIE SO GEFÄHRLICH MACHT!! Menschen machen Fehler! bei der gasexplosion ist es der zitierte eine Rentner der unschön an der hauswand klebt wie in diesem thread zur verharmlosung der Kernenergie geheißen hat. Bei nem KKW-"Störfall" sind es tausende!!!
Zitat aus report einer amerikanischen aufsichtsbehörde für "zwischenfälle" mit atomarer Strahlung:
Fuel Cycle Facilities (Other Than Nuclear Power Plants)
None of the events that occurred at fuel cycle facilities during
this period was significant enough to be reported as an AO.
Other NRC Licensees (Industrial Radiographers, Medical Institutions,
etc.)
The NRC determined that the following events which occurred at
facilities, licensed or otherwise regulated by the NRC, during this
reporting period were significant enough to be reported as AOs:
02-2 Gamma Stereotactic Radiosurgery (Gamma Knife) Misadministration at
St. Luke's Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Date and Place--July 10, 2001; St. Luke's Medical Center;
Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Nature and Probable Consequences--A patient undergoing Gamma
Stereotactic Radiosurgery (Gamma Knife) was prescribed treatment of 20
Gy (2,000 rad) to a portion of the brain. During the treatment, the
licensee completed three of eight treatment fractions and approximately
one-half of the fourth fraction when the medical physicist and
radiation therapist realized that the administered treatment utilized
the treatment parameters for another patient, resulting in a dose of
12.8 Gy (1,280 rad) to an unintended portion of the brain (i.e., wrong
treatment site).
For treatment, the licensee's medical physics staff prepared
treatment plans for two patients, to be treated on the same day. The
treatment plan for Patient A consisted of a prescribed dose of 18 Gy
(1,800 rad). Prior to initiating treatment of Patient A, someone on the
licensee's staff handed the plan of treatment for Patient B to the
licensee's radiation therapist; later, the therapist could not recall
who had handed her the plan. Using Patient B's treatment plan, the
treatment team set up and delivered the first three fractions to
Patient A and began delivery of the fourth fraction. The error was
discovered by the medical physicist during delivery of the fourth
fraction. Once notified of the error, the radiation oncologist
terminated the treatment.
The medical physicist determined that the treatment delivered a
dose of 12.8 Gy (1,280 rad) to an unintended region of the patient's
brain. The radiation oncologist determined that the location of the
unintended site was far enough away from the intended site to proceed
with the intended treatment.
[[Page 19235]]
The licensee subsequently administered the intended treatment without
incident. The radiation oncologist did not anticipate any immediate
adverse effects to the patient because of the treatment to the wrong
site. He was not certain of the potential for any long-term effects as
a result of the misadministration.
The NRC contracted with a medical consultant to evaluate the
medical data associated with the July 10, 2001, misadministration and
assess any probable deterministic effects to the exposed patient. The
consultant agreed with the licensee's assessment. With regard to long-
term affects, the NRC's consultant concluded that the misadministration
may be at the threshold of late central nervous system injury and may
produce symptoms. The consultant further opined that long-term follow
up was indicated for the patient and that the patient was eligible for
inclusion in the Department of Energy's Office of Epidemiology and
Health Surveillance voluntary life-time morbidity study. The licensee
conducted medical follow up of the patient to identify and respond to
potential adverse medical consequences resulting from the
misadministration in December of 2001. However, during an attempt to
follow up on the patient in June 2002, the licensee lost contact with
the patient.
The licensee notified the patient's referring physician, who was
also the attending neurosurgeon, immediately after the event. The
radiation oncologist informed the patient of the event the following
day and subsequently provided a copy of the report submitted to the
NRC.
Cause or Causes--This misadministration was caused by human error,
in that the licensee staff failed to verify that the treatment plan
used was for the patient being treated. Contributing factors included:
(1) The patient's name was not on each page of the computer-generated
treatment plan; (2) the clipboard obscured the patient's name on the
first page of the treatment plan; and (3) the licensee treated two
patients with similar treatment plans.
Actions Taken To Prevent Recurrence
Licensee--Based on the cause and contributing factors of the
misadministration, the licensee immediately implemented measures to
ensure that patient-specific parameters are confirmed and verified
prior to initiation of treatment. The measures included: (1)
Independent verification of the treatment plan to ensure that it
corresponds to the couch on the Gamma Knife unit; (2) labeling each
page of the computer treatment plan with the patient's name; (3)
placing the treatment plan in the standard pink-colored patient-
specific binder; (4) ensuring that the outside of patient-specific
binders have large lettering indicating the patient's name; (5)
ensuring that all patient-specific binders contain all medical
information for the patient; (6) use of clipboards to hold verification
forms that do not cover up the patient's name at the top of the forms;
and (7) training of applicable staff regarding the cause and
contributing factors of the misadministration and the measures to
ensure that patient-specific parameters are confirmed and verified
prior to initiation of treatment.
NRC--The licensee was cited for violations that included failure to
verify that the treatment parameters implemented were for the patient
being treated.
This event is closed for the purpose of this report.
ENDE ZITAT
Wie gesagt: ist absolut Offtopic im bezug auf atomenergie zur stromerzeugung, aber wie ich finde ein "schönes" beispiel bez. megakritischem umgang mit strahlung!
Meinungen dazu?
