Smartphones, Phablets, Watches, kompakte Mobilgeräte 5.608 Themen, 31.397 Beiträge

Handys erzeugt Gehirntumor

nobes / 44 Antworten / Flachansicht Nickles

Wie ich gesehen habe, lachen viele über die Behauptung Handys erzeugen Tumore.

Leute, das ist Fakt!!
Vor allem Gespräche über 10 Minuten sind gefährlich.

Es gibt zwar keinen wissenschaftlichen Beweis dafür, aber vor 30 Jahren war auch Asbest unschädlich.

Es ist schwierig bis unmöglich auf Handys zu verzichten, aber es geht um den sinnvollen Umgang damit.

Grüße aus Südtirol

Günther
bei Antwort benachrichtigen
Handys machen dick. Andreas42
Handy als Tumorfalle! nobes
nobes, rauchst Du? Ventox
gerhard38 nobes1 „EU-Umweltagentur warnt vor Handy-Strahlung Behörde: Hinweise auf höheres...“
Optionen

Hier noch ein Artikel aus der Wikipedia, auszugsweise:

Mobile phones and cancer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_radiation_and_health
=================================
The World Health Organization has concluded, based upon the consensus view of the scientific and medical communities, that serious health effects (e.g. cancer) are very unlikely to be caused by cellular phones or their base stations[1] [2], and expects to make recommendations about mobile phones in 2007–08.

[...]

In 2006 a large Danish study about the connection between mobile phone use and cancer incidence was published. It followed over 420,000 Danish citizens over 20 years and showed no increased risk of cancer.[15] The German Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) consider this report as inconclusive.[16]

In order to investigate the risk of cancer for the mobile phone user, a cooperative project between 13 countries has been launched called INTERPHONE. The idea is that cancers need time to develop so only studies over 10 years are of interest.[17]

The following studies of long time exposure have been published:

A Danish study (2004) that took place over 10 years and found no evidence to support a link.[15]
A Swedish study (2005) that draws the conclusion that "the data do not support the hypothesis that mobile phone use is related to an increased risk of glioma or meningioma."[18]
A British study (2005) that draws the conclusion that "The study suggests that there is no substantial risk of acoustic neuroma in the first decade after starting mobile phone use. However, an increase in risk after longer term use or after a longer lag period could not be ruled out."[19]
A German study (2006) that states "In conclusion, no overall increased risk of glioma or meningioma was observed among these cellular phone users; however, for long-term cellular phone users, results need to be confirmed before firm conclusions can be drawn."[20]
A joint study that draws the conclusion that "Although our results overall do not indicate an increased risk of glioma in relation to mobile phone use, the possible risk in the most heavily exposed part of the brain with long-term use needs to be explored further before firm conclusions can be drawn."[21]
Other studies on cancer and mobile phones are:

Tumour risk associated with use of cellular telephones or cordless desktop telephones, that states: "We found for all studied phone types an increased risk for brain tumours, mainly acoustic neuroma and malignant brain tumours".[22]
A Swedish scientific team at the Karolinska Institute conducted an epidemiological study (2004) that suggested that regular use of a mobile phone over a decade or more was associated with an increased risk of acoustic neuroma, a type of benign brain tumor. The increase was not noted in those who had used phones for fewer than 10 years.[23]
The INTERPHONE study group from Japan published the results of a study of brain tumour risk and mobile phone use. They used a new approach: determining the SAR inside a tumour by calculating the radiofrequency field absorption in the exact tumour location. Cases examined included glioma, meninigioma, and pituitary adenoma. They reported that the overall odds ratio (OR) was not increased and that there was no significant trend towards an increasing OR in relation to SAR-derived exposure. [24]
==================

Natürlich kann man jetzt unterstellen, alle diese Untersuchungen sowie die WHO sind von der Industrie gesponsert ...

Dafür treten dann einsame Propheten auf, die alles ganz anders sehen
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-wellbeing/health-news/mobile-phones-more-dangerous-than-smoking-or-asbestos-802602.html?r=RSS
Demnach wären Handys noch gefährlicher wie rauchen ...

Wenn man schon unsaubere Motive beim Zustandekommen eines Untersuchungsergebnisses unterstellt, dann sollte man fairer Weise nach solchen Motiven auch bei jenen suchen, die die Gefahren besonders herausstreichen (Profilierungssucht? Mediengeilheit? Forschungsgelder und öffentliche Förderungen losschlagen wollen? Seiner Karriere einen Schub geben wollen? ...)

Gruß, Gerhard

bei Antwort benachrichtigen